home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: daily-planet.execpc.com!usenet
- From: innuendo@execpc.com (Jonathan Gapen)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.networking
- Subject: Re: Amiga Web Browsers
- Date: 20 Apr 1996 00:00:34 GMT
- Organization: esCom Amiga Madison Enthusiast's Organisation
- Message-ID: <4l99f2$qsr@daily-planet.execpc.com>
- References: <aTmosh.1cxn@amiga.ow.nl> <1572.6675T774T2870@Redrobe.demon.co.uk> <4l379c$2u6@news.uni-c.dk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cheerios.execpc.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- X-NewsSoftware: GRn 2.1 Feb 19, 1994
-
-
- In article <4l379c$2u6@news.uni-c.dk> c948374@erlang.gbar.dtu.dk (Rask Ingemann Lambertsen) writes:
- >
- > It is because IBrowse has two animations going while transferring and/or
- > decoding images. If only there was a way of turning them of (both of them),
- > IBrowse would probably be faster.
-
- Replace the transfer animation with the static version.
-
- > MUI seems to use CPU time even for programmes that are idle. Only a few
- > percent (mostly), but it still uses a little bit of CPU time for
- > something.
-
- As MUI installs a Commodities Broker for each program, each loaded MUI
- program will use a bit of CPU time, because there's more code for input events
- to filter through. However, this is also true of non-MUI Commodities.
-
- --
- Jonathan Gapen (innuendo@execpc.com)
- Bread in, toast out. How does it DO that?
-